nintione

Remote Australia Online

Search here for evidence-based reports and resources about remote Australia
Remote Australia is a vast and complex area. To create opportunity, foster social inclusion and drive economic development in this region, you need a comprehensive knowledge base to drive change.
Remote Australia Online is exactly that. It’s an online platform that delivers authoritative research on topics that impact this region and its people, including education and its pathways, policy, business, social and cultural welfare, infrastructure, communication and natural resource management.

Remote Australia Online is for those who want to delve deeper into the complexities of remote Australia: its intricate and interconnected networks, the geographical, social, cultural and environmental influences, its opportunities, challenges, and to understand just what makes this unique region tick.
Report
Comfort and electricity use in remote Australian buildings
Author(s):
Osman, P; Havas, L; Ambrose, M; Clark, G
Published:
2017
Publisher:
Ninti One Limited
This study is aimed at improving the safety, comfort, productivity and energy efficiency of enterprise buildings in remote communities. Two building types, besser block and steel frame, were investigated in both hot arid and hot humid climate zones of northern Australia. Adaptation to climate change and the increasing cost of electricity are key drivers for improving the thermal efficiency of the built environment. The need is particularly acute in remote regions of Australia where temperatures and energy costs are rising. Additionally, building construction for new enterprises is largely reliant on building energy efficiency codes developed in the major cities where the climates are temperate or cool.1 Remote community buildings in Far North Queensland (FNQ) and Central Australia (CA) have unique requirements. Electricity and transport are expensive, incomes are relatively low and maintenance services are almost non-existent. At the same time, enterprise buildings have to provide an environment that is safe and productive while coping with climate extremes that are rarely encountered in Australian cities. The case studies reported here quantify the impact of climate extremes on enterprise buildings in remote Australia. The report will describe the current usage and performance of eight buildings, including their design, function, electricity consumption and thermal response to climate variables. It will provide assessments of the thermal and energy efficiencies of these buildings using AccuRate, a standard tool used throughout Australia to assess the thermal efficiency of buildings. The assessments are intended to inform guidelines for designing remote community enterprise buildings for improved comfort and energy efficiency. They will also demonstrate how the standard building energy efficiency model AccuRate can be adapted for use in remote Australia. Key outcomes and recommendations 1. Electricity consumption savings of up to 40% are achievable if out-of-hours consumption is reduced by: - assessing if appliances and equipment need to run or operate in standby mode 24 hours a day - use of automated controllers to switch off appliances when and where appropriate. 2. Electricity can be saved and comfort improved in buildings with air conditioning by upgrading building design so that air conditioners do not need to run 24 hours a day. Upgrades include: - insulating the walls and ceilings and reducing uncontrolled draughts - using controlled forced ventilation at night in buildings with high thermal mass. 3. The buildings without air conditioning were typically unoccupied for most of the day from late spring to early autumn due to excessive heat. The temperature can be reduced by as much as 5−10 °C and the number of available working days increased by upgrading building design using: - low thermal emissivity foil insulation on the underside of roofs - trees and shrubs to provide shade and transpiration cooling - replacing uninsulated skylights with high insulation translucent honeycomb units - forced ventilation. 4. Evaporative coolers, although very efficient, are too hazardous for use in remote locations due to lack of maintenance resources. The key risks are scaling blockages in sprinklers, leading to fires, and health issues associated with warm stagnant water. 5. The house energy efficiency design and NatHERS rating tool AccuRate could be made suitable for designing thermally efficient enterprise buildings in remote Australia by allowing: - users to input thermal load parameters to account for occupancy and equipment - users to input external environment temperature - calculation of the benefit of low thermal emissivity foil insulation - calculation of the benefit of forced ventilation at different times of day.
Journal Article
The role of Aboriginal literacy in improving English literacy in remote Aboriginal communities: an empirical systems analysis with the Interplay Wellbeing Framework
Author(s):
Wilson, B; Quinn, SJ; Abbott, T; Cairney, S
Published:
2017
Indigenous language endangerment is critical in Australia, with only 120 of 250 known languages remaining, and only 13 considered strong. A related issue is the gap in formal education outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people compared with other Australians, with the gap wider in remote regions. Little empirical research exists in Australia to explore the role of developing Aboriginal literacy through bilingual education to address these combined issues. As a ‘shared space’ collaboration between remote communities, government, and scientists, the Interplay Wellbeing Framework and associated Survey were designed to represent community values and priorities in a quantifiable system to inform policy and practice. A cohort of 842 Aboriginal people aged 15–34 years from four remote communities completed individual surveys designed and administered by Aboriginal community researchers. We applied structural equation modelling to this data to understand the role of cultural indicators on education outcomes. Results confirmed the importance of strong relationships between community and schools. Furthermore, learning about culture and learning literacy in ones first language in schools to develop Aboriginal literacy, is established as a necessary step to improve English literacy in remote schools. This suggests bilingual education and strengthening culture and community involvement in schools are necessary to improve both education outcomes and language preservation.
Report
Preferred transport futures in remote Australia
Author(s):
Spandonide, B.
Published:
2015
Publisher:
Cooperative Research Centre for Remote Economic Participation, Ninti One Limited
This report assesses transport costs in remote Australia at a community level and is aimed at community stakeholders and people involved in planning and operational community development activities. Travellers themselves do not have always clear knowledge of transport costs and may find useful information to better understand some of the main economic parameters of transport activities. How are transport systems in remote Australia? In remote Australia overall, transport systems are less safe, less efficient and less reliable than in non-remote Australia. There is a shortage of transport infrastructures and services. These shortages are likely to be increasing in the context of demographic, economic and climate changes. How much does transport cost in Australia? Annual transport costs range from $8,000 to $18,000/person in Australia. In Australia, people pay $600–$7,500 per year as personal transport expenses. These expenses are on average two to three times higher in non-remote Australia than in remote Australia. The externalities associated with ineffective transport activities range between $6,500 and $17,000 per person per year. These costs are much higher (average of two times higher) in remote Australia than in non-remote Australia. What are the cost differences between transport modes in remote and non-remote Australia? For people who have access to a car, combined annual transport costs are relatively comparable between non-remote and remote Australia. For people who regularly use public transport, combined annual costs (personal expenses and externalities) are around $3,000 higher in remote Australia. For people who do not have access to public or private motorised vehicles, combined annual costs are $4,000–$7,000 higher for people living in remote Australia than for people living in non-remote Australia. Ineffective public transport and a lack of appropriate motorised vehicles increase socio-economic exclusion. This is particularly a concern for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in very remote communities. What do transport costs represent compared to median incomes? Total transport costs as a proportion of the median income are 20–40% higher in remote Australia. One factor is the lower median incomes; however, transport access is the primary factor, with combined costs of personal expenses and externalities representing 60–80% of the median annual income of people living in very remote communities, who are more susceptible to being left without regular access to motorised transport. How transport costs could be decreased? Providing multimodal infrastructure; more affordable, more appropriate and more efficient motorised vehicles, with maintenance facilities; more affordable and regular public transport services; and more affordable and regular community transport services could help to decrease transport personal expenses and transport externalities. In the long term, the use of alternative fuels could enhance the resilience of remote communities and enterprises. Synthesis of key issues: The tyranny of distance is an everyday reality in remote Australia, where transport systems have been continuously improving over the last century through great achievements. Remote Australia has a small population increase, high living costs, high unemployment rates, low incomes, high inequalities in terms of access and an ageing population. In remote Australia, at a community level, transport costs vary considerably from one person to another and from one community to another. However, several trends can be identified: the fact that people travel more is compensated by the fact that people pay less of their personal money per kilometre to travel around than in non-remote Australia. Non-business trips tend to be undertaken by sharing and more use of the vehicles that are accessible and more reliance on non-motorised transport, which is considerably slower. Furthermore, there are fewer transport services available, and the people who are financially disadvantaged invest less in vehicles and equipment, insurance and administration, operating costs and public transport. Critically low private spending and public investment in terms of the size of the areas covered by the public transport network create in turn significant health, social, productivity and wellbeing externalities. This situation is exacerbated by the facts that transport needs are generally greater in remote Australia, that transport activities have to be regularly undertaken in hazardous conditions, and that there is a larger proportion of people with reduced mobility than in non-remote Australia. Employment opportunities are also restricted by high transport costs. As a result, the most disadvantaged communities in terms of transport costs are the most disadvantaged communities in terms of remoteness, income and living costs. For people who are the most underprivileged, which include a higher proportion of women, elderly, disabled, ethnic minorities and low-income people (Dodson et al. 2004b),transport restrictions result in more intense socio-economic forms of exclusion with adverse effects for the communities and the remote Australia economy in general. In a context of population growth and climate change, developing the access to appropriate private motorised transport and efficient public transport as well as opportune policies would help to achieve substantial results.
Thesis
Marketing remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander tourism to Australians
Author(s):
Akbar, S
Published:
2016
Publisher:
UniSA
The present research models Indigenist research methodology, embedded within the marketing discipline, to investigate barriers to Australians participating in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander tourism. Interviews with operators showed that they are keen to attract more Australian consumers, and almost half of Australians surveyed online reported they have some probability of participating in the next five years, yet Australian participation is still low. Foundational to the present research is enacting an Indigenist research methodology (Rigney, L-I 1999), through application of mixed-methods research design, a circular stakeholder engagement approach is achieved through continual operator engagement to ensure that operators are fully represented throughout the research process. Nine operators from six remote Aboriginal tourism businesses that reflected industry variance, including operational models, job descriptions and region/climate types, were interviewed to develop an understanding of the marketing issues affecting them, and what they believe to be the barriers to Australian participation. These interviews informed the development of a survey, administered online, designed to reveal what potential Australian customers associate with remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander tourism and their probability of participation. Interview results suggest that operators are keen to understand how to market to domestic consumers, yet remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander tourism held very low recall as a form of tourism available in remote areas among the 947 survey respondents. This extends knowledge that Mental Availability is an indicator of brand share (Sharp, B 2010) and that brands with lower market share are bought less often by fewer people (Uncles, Ehrenberg & Hammond 1995) to this context and explains why this low recall may contribute to low participation by Australians. However, survey results suggest that rejection levels for remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander tourism are much higher than expected, which refutes previous findings regarding expected levels of rejection (Bogomolova & Romaniuk 2009), and suggests that this may also contribute to low participation by Australians and provide insight into the compounding factors that affect participation in this industry.
Report
Culture, housing, remoteness and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child development: Evidence from the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children
Author(s):
Dockery, A. M.
Published:
2017
Publisher:
Ninti One Limited
The limited empirical evidence available in Australia points to beneficial effects of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ identification with their culture across a range of outcome domains. Living in remote communities, with limited mainstream economic opportunity, services and infrastructure – notably inadequate housing – and the associated mobility that maintains connection to country and kinship networks have been highlighted as cultural aspects that contribute to lower outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, relative to other Australians, on many mainstream indicators of socioeconomic wellbeing. This paper uses data from Waves 1–7 of the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children (LSIC) to explore the interrelationships between families’ housing, culture and remoteness and their children’s outcomes across domains covering physical health, social and emotional wellbeing and cognitive development. Exploratory factor analysis of parents’ responses to questions on culture in Waves 1–4 of the LSIC identifies three key elements of parental attitudes and practices with respect to passing on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to their child: Connection to Country, Connection to Kin and Traditional Knowledge. The Connection to Country and Kin factors are interpreted as reflecting parental aspirations to promote the child’s sense of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander identity. The paper addresses an important weakness in the existing empirical literature, since the research design eliminates the possibility of (the child’s) outcomes ‘causing’ greater cultural identity or engagement. Parents fostering a strong kinship connection is found to contribute to positive child development across the domains investigated. Desire to pass on traditional knowledge appears to be complementary to better cognitive outcomes, but it is correlated with lower school attendance. These findings support arguments that schooling in remote areas should be more culturally appropriate. Greater remoteness is associated with inferior aspects of housing, notably more crowding and a high incidence of government and community housing, but there is little evidence that this has a substantial impact on child outcomes. Parental education, having at least one parent in work and adequate family financial resources are found to be associated with positive child development.
Journal Article
Indigenous and tribal peoples' health (The Lancet 2013;Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study
Author(s):
Anderson, Ian; Robson, Bridget; Connolly, Michele; Al-Yaman, Fadwa; Bjertness, Espen; King, Alexandra; Tynan, Michael; Madden, Richard; Bang, Abhay; Coimbra, Carlos E. A., Jr.; Pesantes, Maria Amalia; Amigo, Hugo; Andronov, Sergei; Armien, Blas; Obando, Daniel Ayala; Axelsson, Per; Bhatti, Zaid Shakoor; Bhutta, Zulfiqar Ahmed; Bjerregaard, Peter; Bjertness, Marius B.; Briceno-Leon, Roberto; Broderstad, Ann Ragnhild; Bustos, Patricia; Chongsuvivatwong, Virasakdi; Chu, Jiayou; Deji,; Gouda, Jitendra; Harikumar, Rachakulla; Htay, Thein Thein; Htet, Aung Soe; Izugbara, Chimaraoke; Kamaka, Martina; King, Malcolm; Kodavanti, Mallikharjuna Rao; Lara, Macarena; Laxmaiah, Avula; Lema, Claudia; Taborda, Ana María León; Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan; Lobanov, Andrey; Melhus, Marita; Meshram, Indrapal; Miranda, J. Jaime; Mu, Thet Thet; Nagalla, Balkrishna; Nimmathota, Arlappa; Popov, Andrey Ivanovich; Poveda, Ana María Peñuela; Ram, Faujdar; Reich, Hannah; Santos, Ricardo V.; Sein, Aye Aye; Shekhar, Chander; Sherpa, Lhamo Y.; Skold, Peter; Tano, Sofia; Tanywe, Asahngwa; Ugwu, Chidi; Ugwu, Fabian; Vapattanawong, Patama; Wan, Xia; Welch, James R.; Yang, Gonghuan; Yang, Zhaoqing; Yap, Leslie
Published:
2016
Publisher:
Elsevier
BACKGROUND: International studies of the health of Indigenous and tribal peoples provide important public health insights. Reliable data are required for the development of policy and health services. Previous studies document poorer outcomes for Indigenous peoples compared with benchmark populations, but have been restricted in their coverage of countries or the range of health indicators. Our objective is to describe the health and social status of Indigenous and tribal peoples relative to benchmark populations from a sample of countries. METHODS: Collaborators with expertise in Indigenous health data systems were identified for each country. Data were obtained for population, life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, low and high birthweight, maternal mortality, nutritional status, educational attainment, and economic status. Data sources consisted of governmental data, data from non-governmental organisations such as UNICEF, and other research. Absolute and relative differences were calculated. FINDINGS: Our data (23 countries, 28 populations) provide evidence of poorer health and social outcomes for Indigenous peoples than for non-Indigenous populations. However, this is not uniformly the case, and the size of the rate difference varies. We document poorer outcomes for Indigenous populations for: life expectancy at birth for 16 of 18 populations with a difference greater than 1 year in 15 populations; infant mortality rate for 18 of 19 populations with a rate difference greater than one per 1000 livebirths in 16 populations; maternal mortality in ten populations; low birthweight with the rate difference greater than 2% in three populations; high birthweight with the rate difference greater than 2% in one population; child malnutrition for ten of 16 populations with a difference greater than 10% in five populations; child obesity for eight of 12 populations with a difference greater than 5% in four populations; adult obesity for seven of 13 populations with a difference greater than 10% in four populations; educational attainment for 26 of 27 populations with a difference greater than 1% in 24 populations; and economic status for 15 of 18 populations with a difference greater than 1% in 14 populations. INTERPRETATION: We systematically collated data across a broader sample of countries and indicators than done in previous studies. Taking into account the UN Sustainable Development Goals, we recommend that national governments develop targeted policy responses to Indigenous health, improving access to health services, and Indigenous data within national surveillance systems.
Book Section
Do traditional culture and identity promote the wellbeing of Indigenous Australians? Evidence from the 2008 NATSISS
Author(s):
Dockery, A. M.
Published:
2012
Publisher:
Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University E Press
This chapter reports results from one of several ongoing avenues of investigation into the relationship between Indigenous Australians’ attachment to traditional culture and their socioeconomic outcomes and wellbeing. In an analysis of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2002 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS), Dockery (2010a) presented evidence that Indigenous people with stronger attachment to their culture fare better on a range of outcomes: self-assessed health, substance abuse, incidence of arrest, employment and educational attainment. Motivating this analysis was an attempt to reconsider the enduring debate between the two predominant and opposing schools of thought on how best to address relations between the Indigenous Australian peoples and what has become ‘mainstream’ society: self-determination versus assimilation. This has been fought out primarily as a normative debate, with different camps offering their views on what should improve the wellbeing of Indigenous Australians. It is also a debate that has been largely premised on the assumption that elements of traditional Indigenous culture are incompatible with the achievement of socioeconomic outcomes valued in mainstream society. Even those who argue for the right of Indigenous people to maintain traditional culture and lifestyles often present this choice as a trade-off with socioeconomic outcomes valued in the mainstream, but as a legitimate choice for Indigenous people to make.
There are no available cars matching the current filters.
Reset All