Case study research methods for theory building

Case study research methods for theory building Journal Article

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

  • Author(s): Woodside, AG., Wilson, EJ.
  • Published: 2003
  • Volume: 18

Abstract: This article provides a new definition for case study research. Achieving deep understanding of processes and other concept variables (e.g. actors’ perceptions of their own thinking processes, intentions and contextual influences) is identified as the principal objective of case study research. Using multiple methods to “triangulate” (i.e. confirm and deepen understanding by using multiple sources all focusing on the same process/event) within the same case is described. The article outlines the core criticisms made by case study researchers of large sample surveys. A need exists for a paradigm shift in research on organizational behavior (including modeling the antecedents of new product performance). The article outlines the telling weaknesses of case study research as seen by other researchers. The article examines Senge’s core propositions related to the “mental models” of decision participants. Details illustrate the use of specific research methods for case studies to achieve different research objectives and the combination of objectives. Finally, the article illustrates basic concept variables in a case study and 12 propositions are reviewed briefly. This report reviews classic and recent contributions in the literature on case study research.

Cite this document

Suggested Citation
Woodside, AG., Wilson, EJ., 2003, Case study research methods for theory building, Volume:18, Journal Article, viewed 13 June 2024,

Endnote Mendeley Zotero Export Google Scholar

Share this page

Search again